The Independent.UK: Hollywood questions ‘The Twitter Effect’.
Okay ... first, Hollywood looked at Twitter, and tried to get a direct, measurable dollar figure out of the service. That didn’t work. Next, they valued it for ‘buzz’ and assumed there would be relatively unmeasurable but obvious payoffs. Now that looks like it is a false assumption. So what *is* Twitter good for? Seems like Hollywood thinks: ads.
Comments:
There are no comments at this time for this entry.
Previous entry: DP Review: Nikon D3100 Hands-on Preview.
Next entry: NewMexiKen: Driving Across America.
